[ROM] Plutonium,Neodium,Titanium [21916,28244] - Page 877

huntnyc · #**8761** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 07:27 PM

Is there any substitute for Skyfire - I guess it is finished and thanks.

Gary

kirstein · #**8762** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 07:49 PM

It's really not known if there's any advantage to cooking CHT in vs installing it in cab form. I've been running CHT 2.0 on top of the latest Pluto 28244, it works great.

**kozmo** · #**8763** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huntnyc

Is there any substitute for Skyfie - I guess it is finished and thanks.

Gary

You can try uZard or UCBrowser

cganesh75 · #**8764** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 09:51 PM

ok. i got the itch to flash and flashed the 28244 version. pretty solid so far. great rom

**vin255764** · #**8765** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huntnyc

Was I just seeing things or did I see 90 MB of free ram after loading 22045? Have gone away from this to test another but can anyone confirm this? I will be installing that one again and hopefully settle on it for a while. Again, thanks vin.

Gary

Flashing 22045.Its a rare build

huntnyc · #**8766** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 11:38 PM

vin,
I flashed 22045 and also 28244 and both had about same meory to me. Running 28244 with Cookie 2.0 and uTask. Runnine fine and thanks for the tip on uTask. Think I now understand how to work it and it is great to close out programs.

Gary

**vin255764** · #**8767** (**permalink**) 11-15-2010, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirstein

I wish I understood the differences in these branches. I get the part about LG version, HTC version, Sony Version. Who is Com3? And of more interest to me, what really are the differences in these builds. Are some features missing at the request of the manufacturers? Do the manufacturers tweak the builds?
And what of the 28xxx builds, They've been good so far, but where are they coming from?

Thanks

28xx is a mistery...SYS base 28244, ALL Res. WMD - PPCKitchen

Solver · #**8768** (**permalink**) 11-16-2010, 12:59 AM

Two days with 28244 & cht2, I think the battery is actually better than 10-17. Wow. Nice and smooth.

I have also been running utask. Perfect place for that button.

Solver · #**8769** (**permalink**) 11-16-2010, 01:09 AM

Obligatory post to get my avatar back.

I know, it's like watching Darren hitting 10k, er, I mean 20k posts.

Because of this community and vin I can't think of a good enough reason to leave my PPC.

**mwalt2** · #**8770** (**permalink**) 11-16-2010, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirstein

It's really not known if there's any advantage to cooking CHT in vs installing it in cab form. I've been running CHT 2.0 on top of the latest Pluto 28244, it works great.

There is no difference other then the extra space it takes up if you cab install since you overwrite a few manila files (small amount of space in the scheme of things). A cab just copies things to folders on your phone, just like cooking them in places them in folders on your phone. The only difference I know of as far as cab install / cooking things is when it comes to modules. Modules must be cooked into a ROM and turned into files if you want to cab install it. Since CHT does not use any modules, there should be absolutely no difference in performance.