Opera 9.7 beta + Flash Lite 3.1 Vs Opera 8.65 + Flash 7

[ej48315]

See post #5

[Solange82200]

My situation is a little different, but I do know that I have Opera 9.5 on my phone, and I was so excited to try out 9.7beta since everyone seems to use it now, and it was a lot worse. Pages wouldn't render correctly, slow, etc. I was very disappointed, so I just stuck with 9.5.

[Nagrom Nniuq]

I use Skyfire or the new IE for all my flash. I like Opera 9.7 for everything else. It is more finger friendly, efficient, fast, and refined than anything else IMO (and I have tried every browser available).

[ej48315]

post #5

[ej48315]

I tried every single build of opera mobile 9.5 / 9.7beta that I could find and a few different flash lite 3.1 cabs.

Results:
(based on rendering of flash content)
9.7 beta was the worst and every other build of 9.5 basicly sucked ACCEPT the latest i900 Build 15746 ripped from the samsung omnia coupled with the juggalo_x flash lite 3.1 cab.

Im very pleased with the flash rendering performance / stability / speed / extra features / precise zoom of this build.


I would also like to mention that this flash lite 3.1 works great with Iris 1.1.9 so I included that also.

[umpac18]

I will try this, thank you

[bluruld]

Any WVGA option for build 15233?

[ej48315]

Originally Posted by bluruld

Any WVGA option for build 15233?

I just did some searching and could not find one. Maybe you can take the skin folder from Opera Mobile 9.5 Build 2649 (WVGA from Touch HD) and replace it with the one in 15233.

[bluruld]

Well I'm running the 15233 VGA with flash lite 3.1.

Chathour worked but beatport and youtube didn't worked.

[ej48315]

Try resetting your device , activate desktop mode in opera settings, youtube works fine for me, I have not tried beatport.

After this if you still have issues your rom might have its own flash embeded in it causing issues.