wisbar advanced desktop vs MS 3

ElAguila · #1 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 02:06 AM

How does Wisbar Advanced Desktop compare to the Mobile Shell 3? Is it more customizeable. Which one uses less memory. Which one performs better?

zero157h7 · #2 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 12:54 PM

WAD is more customizable but MS3 is leaps and bounds better on performance.

**Genjinaro** · #3 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 04:16 PM

Wisbar Advanced Desktop: it depends, it can be slow depending on what images are used in the customization & how many pages you use.
WAD is very customizable but it takes time. I prefer to combine it with WA3... (I'm using both now for my HTC Hero theme

)

Get WAD if you like to get your hands dirty & WIN.

MS3 is great IMHO, unlike WAD I'd buy this by default though. Its a MUST have app.

ElAguila · #4 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 05:20 PM

I am currently using WA3 and MS 3. I was debating getting the WAD2 instead of MS 3. There is also the option of PointUI

**Genjinaro** · #5 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElAguila

I am currently using WA3 and MS 3. I was debating getting the WAD2 instead of MS 3. There is also the option of PointUI

Trial WAD and really take time to get into it,

WAD > Point UI IMHO

i.e WAD Custom HTC Hero theme:

rb240z · #6 (**permalink**) 07-29-2009, 08:11 PM

pointui is a lighter program and can be faster than wad. Been playing with both the last week and i think pointui is much more user friendly. Wad was very slow at times reguardless of settings.