This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: WM6.5 Titanium Plugin - JMLToday
Quote:
![]() |
|
||||
Re: WM6.5 Titanium Plugin - JMLToday
read through about 20 pages on the thread at xda http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...&postcount=318
if you just rename the folder it should work. I'm using caulkin's latest and it has the WM7 titanium so it's double the size as the normal 6.5. The Hero_allres didn't work got an error message when installing. the JML_today_hero is off I only have the bottom half and I believe it's due to the difference with WM7 titanium theme.
__________________
Sprint Touch Pro 2
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: WM6.5 Titanium Plugin - JMLToday
Yes - JMLToday 5.4 checks for resolution (on 5.3 the Plugin disappeared because of wrong Resolution).
So we are about to transfer it from ATPluginInstaller to TICS as Installer, because there are much more possibilities to handle such problems - but nevertheless - like each Plugin: The .plg has to contain the correct resolution ![]() But with .plg-Resizer you can convert each .plg to yor Resolution: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=543656 I have also posted a TICS-Version for JMLToday (as Beta) - so that JMLToday can be installed in each .cpr aka each Theme (Neo, Bliss,...) : http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...&postcount=283 I think it's useful touseTICS-Installer for each Titanium-Plugin as Expansion in Functionality from ATPluginInstaller - threfore I wrote it. It's easier to skin single .plg's than whole .cpr's - and much more flexible. And besides - the Plugins are installed in each Theme - and that's interesting enough for a Plugin-Developer and Theme-Maker. So TICS_installer is noting for the User to download - only the Develeopers&Skinners (TICS_Controller and TICS_Saver will be for the Users later on) - Beta2 is running fine: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=564884 JMLToday is something like a "middleware" - it provides functionalities for images, informations and Windows-Notifications (in C++ with no performance loss, not as Mortscript ![]() So - if you have ideas: Just tell 'em ![]() Cheers Micha |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
![]() |
|
|
|