|
||||
Re: Actual Difference Between Treo.800w & Treo Pro ?
I owned a Treo 800W (actually 3) and finally gave up, went with the Touch Pro. The 800W is not made by HTC and has issues that I at first did not consider issues. I would go with the Treo Pro. However, the Sprint Treo Pro has a memory issue - program memory lacks and that causes the device to slow down something fierce.
__________________
Another beautiful day in Paradise on the Leeward coast with a TP2 and Evo!
|
|
||||
Re: Actual Difference Between Treo.800w & Treo Pro ?
Get the Treo Pro or the Touch Pro. The 800w really is a waste of money (even at $100 brand new). Differences are better battery life, working GPS, smaller size, better earpiece quality, more refined OS, IE6, real MMS, etc.
|
|
||||
Re: Actual Difference Between Treo.800w & Treo Pro ?
Quote:
to be honest? they have much more in common than differences
$99 vs $249 is a big deal for some. I have a friend who has never had a smartphone but wants one like the Treo. He has credit problems and not much cash so the $99 800w is a steal as no way can he do $249 (which is overpriced, imo) I can't say one device is "hands down" better than the other as they both have their pros and cons. If money is a concern, get teh 800w and use it for 25 days. If you LIKE it, the Treo Pro won't be much of an upgrade at all. If you DON'T LIKE IT, then try the Treo Pro. That's really how all of this will come down--how you feel about the 800w. Personally, I like the 800w so the Treo Pro is nice, but hardly mind blowing for 2009. The 800w is certainly more similar to the 700wx than the Treo Pro is as Palm's software is gutted from the Treo Pro. ps And yeah, the lack of RAM on the Treo Pro is disheartening and right now IE6 is a bit wonky. Last edited by Malatesta; 02-03-2009 at 03:29 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
|