Evo 4g/Evo 3D

[BlackDynamite]

Originally Posted by gTen

um ok then lets review based on our spec comparison.


Screen: Tie as one has qhd and 3d while the other is super amoled plus
Processor: SGS2 as higher productivity score
GPU: Ill give it a tie for now due to disputed resolution debate
ROM: SGS2 as more rom
Camera: Unkown as for camera the sensor is most important and we have no way of comparing until both devices hit the street
LED: Evo as dual LED
FFC: SGS2 as 2mp
Weight: SGS2 as lighter
Battery: Evo3d as bigger battery
wifi:SGS2 as 5ghz support
Thickness: SGS2 as thinner
NFC: SGS2 as actually has one
Hardware encryption: SGS2 as has encryption
Codecs: SGS2 as more codecs

So the red is Evo 3d wins, blue is SGS 2 wins and green is ties..purple is unkown factors..by these results SGS 2 has better hardware specs..

Look you have to understand this..samsung has the advantage...while HTC has to spend time with the manufacturer samples to build their devices..Samsung can skip the 3-6month R&D and already start designing a phone...so all the components samsung gets will be 3-6 month ahead of HTC in newness...

I will skip all the BS about how the bench marks of a Sensation with lower specs should be considered valid. You can say it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. the fact is, the Evo 3D WILL bench higher than the Sensation. Period. And another thing, it's not fair to bench a stock Sense ROM. You want accurate bench tests, the absolute LEAST you can do is bench the actual phone you're trying to compare. Not some lesser phone and then try to lie and say the bench will be the same. And in addition to that, use an AOSP ROM, not a freaking stock, bloated ROM.

Now, onto your spec comparison:
Screen: Evo 3D wins in a landslide. Not only is it a much higher resolution, but it's glasses free 3D. To say this is a tie is flat out BS.
Processor: Your BS bench marks aside, we don't know which processor is better. The OS they are running on has never supported dual cores. We'll see hwo they do on an OS made to support them.
Camera: Evo 3D in a landslide. It shoots 3D videos and pictures. To say this is a tie is more BS.
LED: Evo 3D has dual.
FFC: Funny how you said the back camera was unknown, even though the Evo has 2 of them and does 3D, but you call the FFC a win for the Galaxy S 2. This one is the true unknown.
Weight: Galaxy S 2 but who cares. A few grams difference won't be anything you notice.
Battery: Evo 3D in a landslide.
Wifi: Evo 3D does 5Ghz Wifi. You putingt this as a win for the Galaxy S2 is more BS.
Thickness: galaxy S2 but who cares. A couple mm isn't something you will notice.
NFC: Galaxy S2. Who cares? Nobody uses NFC right now anyway, and if you want it you can get an SD card.
Hardware encryption: The Evo 3D has hardware encryption. More BS that you put this as a win for the Galaxy S2.
Codecs: Again, more BS that you would put codecs as an advantage. You can install whatever codec you want on the Evo 3D.

So cutting through all of your BS and false claims, the real numbers (on the stuff you posted) would be Evo 3D: 4, Galaxy S2: 3 (and that is counting NFC, which can be added to the Evo 3D), Unknown or tie: 4

Now, lets talk about the full HDMI device output, the HTC Watch movie service, and the youtube 3D app.