03-18-2007, 11:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I gave this program another try and I'm not too sure if I like it or not. For one, it's not really designed for our square screens, despite what their website says. The scroll bars do not function correctly.
As for real functionality, the program seems to close after I press the keylock screen to unlock my keyboard after turning the device on. I soft-resetted too to make sure that wasn't a problem after installing. I'll leave it on for a few days, atleast until the trial ends. Then I'll most likely just get rid of it.
__________________
Learn something new today.... Visit www.deviantdictionary.com !
|
|
03-19-2007, 05:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i am trying it out right now and it works wonders at 512. i dont know about the power life, but i can really tell the performance differnce. 2 thumbs up for now!
|
|
03-20-2007, 08:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
curious
is anyone else able to run at 624 or are you just not trying that speed...I'm very surprised that a 312 processor can run at 624 stable...I had a 6700 which has a 416 only run stable at 520...just curious if anyone else has tried it...
|
|
03-23-2007, 02:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is totally counter to what the topic is about... but anyone using xcpuscalar to underclock their CPU when idle in order to gain more battery life?
|
|
03-24-2007, 05:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So I have been using this for the past few days at 520 and haven't really noticed too much of a difference: internet browsing, tasks, meetings, email, etc. For this of you running at 520, where does it make a difference when using it? I'm trying to see if its worth my $20.
|
|
03-26-2007, 05:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only way you can tell a difference if you have a lot of program loading on your phone. Try loading sbp pocket plus and then overclock your phone u can tell a major difference.
|
 |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.
