Engadget gives 6/10.....

[sorge]

I have to say this is pretty amazing to me.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/13/droid-2-review/

Mean while the iphone 4 got a 9/10 review. WTF is up with this site. I already know that cnet gives all good phones a 4/5 stars(they literally never give more, meaning a 4/4 is a perfect score I suppose). But a 6 out of 10.

Moto fixed the keyboard, gave it as much power as any phone available, and changed the design up more then the 3G into 3GS ever did. They send the whole time saying how the phone is small (3.7, pretty standard, not everyone wants 4.3) and critizing the camera. Using these standards, what would ally get if put to the same grading scale? I'm thinking 3 out of 10.

[gTen]

Well they didn't exactly give it as much power as any phone available..but what pretty much happens is this...the person who reviews the Apple products is an Apple fanboy...the one who reviews the other devices is neutral...

So by the Apple fanboy Apple can do no wrong but he can't give a 10 so he gives a 9..the other guy sees data/signal issues and he gives it a harsh mark :/

[91ludesit]

Poorly written article is poorly written.

[Laos101]

expect a PPCGeeks review in the coming days