Quote:
Originally Posted by seidioseidio
If what you said is true, then read the feedback of post # 26 in this thread. Mtnmedic will not see any imporvement over the stock battery at all in using Seidio's battery. But thta is not the case. Below is Post # 26 by mtnmedic
Well, I've had mine for quite a while and I still consistently get 24-28 hours' worth of use out of it, depending on what I do with it. Of course, this is with the battery hacks mentioned earlier (but then, who WOULDN'T want battery power management enabled?).
It's a good battery. Get yourself one. You won't be disappointed. The stock battery door is a little tough to put back on but it DOES go on. Now the phone has a nice solid feel to it.
|
Thank you Seidio-Seidio,
As the "company in question", do you stand by your products and sales you have made? Will you issue a refund if within the warrenty period, even though some are starting to wonder if your representation of this battery isn't just slick marketing... which is illegal due to the "testing" that appears to have been done?
Besides just stating that it is a "good battery", what evidance from 3rd party testing you do you have to offer to be fair?
Via the Seidio website, I filled out the RMA section and requested an RMA return/refund since I just bought by battery 2 weeks ago.
Getting into a "pissing match" here on the boards will not serve either of us... what I want to read in "black and white" is will you offer a refund if a customer so desires?
Thanks,