Quote:
Originally Posted by zeurx
one suggestion, the start of the second XIP may not always be 0x00320000, instead search for the HEX string "FE 03 00 EA 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00", there will be two of these HEX strings (One for the first XIP and one for the second XIP) and will signify the beginning of an XIP.
|
No. That doesn't signify the beginning of a xip. That's why no one says to do it that way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeurx
|
The source is not available and that was designed for WM5.