|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
What I'd like to see:
WM6.1 w/ IE6 for Sprint > Slide to answer > TouchFlo slider for menus, with scrolling tweak > Battery Performance Tweaks > Internet Sharing > Contacts page with vertical a-z quickscroll > Start-menu recently run programs in the top horizontal icon format instead of listing the names (gotta be a better name for this) > VoiceCommand 1.6.19209 > Louder volume > MobileOffice > Enhanced Power Options the rest I can install myself Last edited by izanagi; 03-30-2009 at 09:50 PM. |
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
u can try sceptre rom. just uninstall the pointui interface if u dont like.
__________________
#############################################################
## Rom: None # Provider: Verizon # Experience: Advanced # Phone:Verizon TP2 ## ############################################################# |
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
click on the image in my sig and try my 21109 clean rom... it's pretty stripped
|
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
Quote:
While my typical battery discharge current is ~57mA, when I tried cooking up my own I was getting ~131 - 157mA, never below. I will try your clean rom and get you some feedback. Cheers |
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
Quote:
dcd .......
__________________
My name will appears multiple times spelled different in this sentence , I have two other siblings with the same name as me, don't think to hard to guess what my name is too , who am I
|
|
||||
Re: Which rom for pure windows mobile (stripped of TouchFlo & the like)??
dcd's roms are very very basic and known to be snappy, even from the Titan days. I've tried both the 6.1 and 6.5 flavors, but they were way too stripped for me. It's likely to require several installs to get it the way you've explained.
|
|
|
|