Camera Settings - Page 3

jimmiekain · #1 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 08:43 PM

nope! i havent changed any of the settings at all... I think the problem is that I dont know anything about cameras... I just take the pics and try my best to hold it as still as possible. Can a few other people post a few of your pics so we can see what yours look like? Also if your a camera person/photographer/paparazzi LOL can you help us out with settings advice? Also, does anyone know what ISO is?

Exil3d · #2 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmiekain

nope! i havent changed any of the settings at all... I think the problem is that I dont know anything about cameras... I just take the pics and try my best to hold it as still as possible. Can a few other people post a few of your pics so we can see what yours look like? Also if your a camera person/photographer/paparazzi LOL can you help us out with settings advice? Also, does anyone know what ISO is?

Well.. just like the Pro1, you just have to have a very steady hand. To me it looks like the PRO2 camera over saturates the whites in the pics. SOmetimes if you play with the environment settings you can get better results. Hands down thou.. the PRO1 has a better camera. IMO.

Exil3d · #3 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 08:53 PM

Another thng. Make 100% sure theres no finger prints in the lens!

JZ* · #4 (**permalink**) 10-10-2009, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exil3d

Another thng. Make 100% sure theres no finger prints in the lens!

This point can't be missed...I wipe mine off before every camera use!

**MightyMike** · #5 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 09:27 PM

Tp2 camera is definitely much better than Tp1. Hands down.

You guys are crazy lol!

**santod** · #6 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 09:37 PM

Mike, I definitely agree. I also feel it is a better camera then the TP1's was.

linzgeneral · #7 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 10:32 PM

I never had the TP1 but my Diamond camera looks like a 5 megapixel compared to my Pro 2 or anything I have seen posted taken with a Pro 1. People are astonished when I show them pictures I took with my diamond. Its like night and day compared to the Pro 2. That being said I would not take 5 Diamonds for my Pro 2. (Hmmm...maybe I can sell them all, buy a Pro 2 and have $500 in the bank......)

**themuffinman** · #8 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 10:45 PM

To the original poster, do you have to take pictures of yourself to test the camera? I don't know about anyone else but it makes me feel uncomfortable just staring at some dude seeing which picture of him looks more detailed. LOL, sorry but I had to say something.

**santod** · #9 (**permalink**) 09-27-2009, 10:52 PM

Really? Comin' from the guy with the transfhomos teabaggin in his sig.? Not to mention the robot crotch as an avatar!? Sorry, just had to say something in response to that one. I see no problem with looking at a picture of some dude(fully clothed), to check picture quality. Are we that insecure these days? C'mon man! Meaningless posts like that, do nothing but trigger more meaningless posts like this one and on it goes. We don't need to sift through this kind of crap while digging for useful information. I'm done, that was my 2 cents worth.

jimmiekain · #10 (**permalink**) 09-28-2009, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by themuffinman

To the original poster, do you have to take pictures of yourself to test the camera? I don't know about anyone else but it makes me feel uncomfortable just staring at some dude seeing which picture of him looks more detailed. LOL, sorry but I had to say something.

LOL I thought about that after I put the 1st one up but then when i put the second one up I figured I should take the same pic (plus the hat) so that the difference would be clear... I'm off to work but when I get back im gonna post some new pics of new stuff. hahahaha