![]() |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
|
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Sprint and vzw do have more nationwide coverage, no argument here. But those that don't travel much and live in big cities should give T-Mobile a try, but smaller areas T-Mobile does suck balls.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
CW |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
|
Re: Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
On the flip side, Sprint doesn't have 4G coverage hardly anywhere. I don't see how you can justify Sprint charging everyone for 4G, and in the same post say T-Mobile coverage is a joke. T-Mobile has more HSPA+ coverage than Sprint has Wimax coverage. |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Salty has a point, T-Mobile hspa+ coverage (which will be T-Mobile's whole 3g network) will cover more 4g then sprint by years end.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
|
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
Quote:
I'll be chuckling when they have to remove the $10 fee because they'll have to reneg on their "unlmited" feature when people are streaming entire movies to their phones and choking the network. |
Re: $10 is really bothering you? Check this out.
But the shortend of this post was basically to show everyone how much vzw and att customers are getting ripped off which still holds water. Their customers with these types of phones are all paying over $100 a month easy.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com