|
||||
Wirelessly posted (ACS WP7 Guide Mango'd: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; XBLWP7; ZuneWP7))
Sprint users have spoken, Verizon link in the comments... http://www.wpcentral.com/sprint-user...execs-comments Last edited by Dr.8820; 01-12-2012 at 03:42 PM. Reason: fixed link |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Quote:
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Not like their network could bring out the best in them anyway but still.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Agreed 100%.... Verizon needs to get off their A$$ and give customers what they want, Not just what they think they want.
__________________
My Windows Media Center HTPC blog and site.
http://mc.anywherecool.com/Blog/ If I helped in anyway, please hit thanks ! |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Also signed and signed it where it counts, cancelling my contract and moved on, letting them know specifically my reasons for leaving. Still don't understand how an OS can be judged by only 1 phone. To me it says take it or leave it. Even the non poweruser that might have never heard of "Windows Mobile" might simply NOT decide on WP7 and the "Arrive" due to screen size, keyboard,or manufacturer. Half the people I know simply buy phones on price, recommendation of the rep, friend, biggest screen size, no keyboard, thinnest profile, or lightest weight, advertisement (bad M$ bad), as well as, what everyone else is using (Android/Iphone). Still, one choice is not a good way to judge what people want when different criteria apply. It will be interesting to see how the "publicized" Titan II, Nokia 900, and the budget friendly 710 (esp Wal Mart) play out. Will our frustrations be justified that the average user will want Windows Phone? Not everyone cares enough to "jump ship" for a phone like I did.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Quote:
At first I was annoyed that Sprint wasn't bringing a new device to the table. They didnt promote Windows Phone other than a press release, and from my experience at the authorized retail store showed a lack of: placement of a running model, to education- from calling the phone "Windows Mobile", to how they handled the device, and reading from the box the features. "User experience". The same can be said for any of Sprints devices that are only operating on their 3G network. The wait for another Windows Phone will not be so bad IF the next device is LTE/Apollo. I like the looks of the Nokia Lumia 900 and HTC Titan II, but I would rather have next gen software/hardware built into the device. I think we can agree that would be better than feeling like HTC Titan owners now...
__________________
Sanyo SCP-4900, Sanyo MM-8300, Audiovox PPC 6700, HTC Mogul PPC-6800, HTC Touch Pro 2, HTC EVO, Samsung Focus, HTC HD7, HTC Arrive.
|
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Quote:
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Isn't that the truth. If the network is subpar so will the user experience on any device whether it be Android, W7, or the Iphone. Frankly my wife has the iphone on verizon and our 3g coverage is so bad in my house it made her dislike the phone. Logging onto facebook, streaming video, you name it was a chore. Of course wifi fixed that but the network certainly impacts the users experience.
|
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: Sprint not too enthusiastic on Windows Phone 7
Quote:
|
|
|
|