Warez Vs. Tethering

**dannzeman** · #1 (**permalink**) 02-23-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schettj

Is PPCGeeks Selling WmWifiRouter? Can you download it from ppcgeeks?

What is your problem man? You want to go on a crusade against illegal tethering, fine, go for it. I still don't get what the point of this topic is.

You want some other people to get banned? Just say so. You think you were unfairly banned? Just say so.

This topic is useless except for humor value.

schttj, the is the point:

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazychef

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannzeman

schettj, the OP states very clearly this thread wasn't started to discuss a moral or legal issue. He has stated several times that he steals a service you are supposed to pay for.

The point of this thread was this: We're not allowed to talk about anything remotely connected to warez because it's stealing software that we are supposed to pay for. So then why are we allowed to talk about ways to steal a service that we are supposed to pay for?

It doesn't matter how we steal the service, whether it comes on your phone or not or whether it works out of the box or not. That doesn't matter. The fact of it is that Sprint wants you to pay for a Phone As Modem plan to use data on a device that isn't your phone. We are getting around paying for that plan by whatever means, which is stealing. The OP thinks we shouldnt be able to talk about stealing service we are supposed to pay for and compared it to the currently enforced rule of not being able to talk about stealing software we are supposed to pay for.

EXACTLY!!!!

**schettj** · #2 (**permalink**) 02-23-2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannzeman

schttj, the is the point:

Quote:

The OP thinks we shouldnt be able to talk about stealing service we are supposed to pay for and compared it to the currently enforced rule of not being able to talk about stealing software we are supposed to pay for.

And as we replied now 157.99 times

The OP can think whatever he wants. He can create his own forum and be GOD OF THE FORUM.

He's not so here.

This forum complies with the DMCA. The only legal requirement of a US-based private forum is that it must comply with the DMCA.

That's the end of the story. There is nothing else to debate. It's all covered right there.

Anything else has a different purpose, which the OP actually has but won't admit. Or we would have been done about 200 posts ago.