|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
Quote:
__________________
Phone History (last 2yrs or less): Sanyo5500>Sanyo8300>SamsungA920>Moto i930>Moto i870>Moto Q>The Mogul & a iC902> Touch Pro & iC902>Touch Pro and a Palm Pre> just a Pre for now>>HTC EVO (white)!
![]() |
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
Oh my office can care less about the phone I use.. hell, The only reason I brought this up was because the contract company was limited by sprint and only allowed to offer like 5 different phones max.
I will ask them if I have a sprint phone if they could activate it.. hehe.. but my inside man thinks they won't do it. Last edited by unscathed; 02-20-2008 at 02:21 PM. |
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
My Question is, if you set up the account and get whatever phone on the service. What's to stop you from calling Sprint and having them swap out the ESN to a phone you want after the service is set up. I would inquire on that as an option.
-CC P.S. New Sprint accounts allow you to personally swap out ESN online. |
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
Quote:
Quote:
The company you are moving to is an MVNO of Sprint (correct?). I could guess which one and would probably get close. The problem has to do with the same reason I can no longer sell my Q or A960. They are using a different billing system and database that what actual sprint uses. They use pls. Sprint does not limit the phones that this company actually gets other than Sprint exclusive and flagship phones usually appear later. There used to be a way to add the ESN to the sprint database. How I was able to use the Q on Sprint in the first place (it was a qwest phone). This no longer works with ensemble. (Hence the I can't sell it). The point. You would have to convince a Sprint Corporate employee to add a Sprint Q9c to the database of allowed phones that your company has in pls. This is against the policy and agreement of the company that you are using. This would negate the MVNO agreement and get the Sprint employee fired. They are only allowed to offer white label phones that they themselves purchased from the OEM. There is absolutely no way to activate a Q9c on a Sprint MVNO until they pick up the phone and purchase a white-label phone. Moto hates MVNO's and the only reason they sold the Q to them was to get rid of their built up supply in wake of the Q9 coming out. Sorry for the bad news. Please ask if you have any other questions. I worked in EQ corp wireless division and we had to explain this to top execs all day long.
__________________
I work for Sprint, I don't speak for them. Moderator PhoneNews.com (Brandon Smith)
Remember to say ![]() Open thread without searching > waste server usage > waste energy > higher gas prices ![]() Think about the economy the next time you feel the need to open a useless thread. ![]() ![]() Last edited by wldthng842; 02-27-2008 at 03:12 PM. |
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
wow.. thanks a bunch for that info.. yea.. we use Cbeyond as our phone solutions provider and they sub the sprint network.. ce la vie.. thanks for the info though ... good stuff
|
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
CBeyond is a nice company but they only take very limited phones. I think they were interested in the Touch but Sprint had a small exclusive and I'm not sure it fit cost wise. They have to pay a lot more for phones than Sprint and others do.
|
|
||||
Re: semi-legal cloning question..
This pertains more to federal laws since you can't get a PTR in California anyway.
Why can't you get a PTR in CA? THey are off-list and can be set up either featureless or with a fixed-mag.
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|
|