|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
As far as Flash goes, I think Apple is very ignorant with it. And I mean in general, even safari on my MacBook Pro is terrible with flash. It's as if they refuse to acknowledge it. I think the Adobe CEO may have gotten drunk and tried sexting Steve's wife.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
well, I don't think I want a colorless reflective sky, but I miss the old party lines, talk a bout sharing easy.. no dial, just pick up the phone.
what I find the most odd about the whole flash thing is that Adobe was one of very few software developers for apple over the decades, why draw the line at flash? wouldn't banning java make more since? java sucks.
__________________
7 windows to rule them all, 7 windows to find them,
7 windows to bring them all, and in the network bind them. Navizon CM&ResProxyKiller nueRom SuspendResume777 |
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
Quote:
__________________
If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun
|
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
The problem with flash is its owned by Adobe... while HTML5 is an open standard. So it's better.
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
That's fine, and a reason why Android is also popular. If you want Flash there are many options for you. Apple still thinks Flash will hurt the performance of their phone, so they haven't allowed it. I would like Flash on my phone but I have chosen that an iPhone without Flash is better for me than an Android phone with it. Sure its not the popular choice around here but so be it.
Based on what I've read recently it seems Apple has loosened the reigns a bit with 3rd party add-ons, so we'll see. Here's the article I'm talking about http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/09/a...tions-will-al/ |
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
Quote:
Microsoft--threatened OEMs, spent millions purchasing and immediately shutting down competitors, had tons of backdoor dealings to ensure its platform was the only one being sold in most markets. Apple--has made a cell phone and decided not to allow certain software on it. Has done nothing to prevent any other cell phone manufacturers from supporting the software, has not attempted to halt the sale of all other cell phones, has threatened no one to my knowledge. Seriously, get your facts straight. Apple's being arrogant and douchebag-esque with its iOS platform. Microsoft was criminal. The difference between the two is astronomical. EDIT: Just go read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft. And then try and claim that what Apple has done even comes close. Microsoft falsified evidence in a federal court. I'm honestly shocked some of its executives aren't doing hard time. I love Windows 7 and I've supported MS platforms for years, but I call a spade a spade. Last edited by spectheintro; 09-11-2010 at 04:15 AM. |
|
||||
Re: Why is iPhone not considered a smartphone?
you don't think apples closed system and tight reins on software is anywhere close?
quoted from the linked wiki Microsoft was not really making any money from Internet Explorer, and its incorporation with the operating system was due to consumer expectation to have a browser packaged with the operating system. For example, BeOS comes packaged with its web browser, NetPositive, and Mac OS X with Safari. Instead, he argued, Microsoft's true anticompetitive clout was in the rebates it offered to OEMs preventing other operating systems from getting a foothold in the market really the m& antitrust more closely resembles the kind of B/S we have to put up with from the carriers and subsidized phones. |
|
|
|