JD's Clean Windows Mobile 6.5 ROM & Kitchen (updated Oct.14) - Page 44

quadjacks · #**431** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:06 PM

I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

mgioia2 · #**432** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks

I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

In my opinion there isn't much difference at all between the two. You'll get basically the same experience out of both JD and DCD's ROM's. They're clean, fast as hell, and work, no questions asked...

**jakdillard** · #**433** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks

I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

if you want regular stability and like the old 6.5 UI unless DCD jumps builds I would stay there truthfully there is nothing to compare as we both for the time being are making clean ROMS

quadjacks · #**434** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard

if you want regular stability and like the old 6.5 UI unless DCD jumps builds I would stay there truthfully there is nothing to compare as we both for the time being are making clean ROMS

Well having a VZW machine, the eye candied ROMs are very sluggish So i've gotten use to having 50-60 Rams free.

So what do you mean by "Old 6.5 UI", aren't you using the latest of all? or is DCD?

**jakdillard** · #**435** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks

Well having a VZW machine, the eye candied ROMs are very sluggish So i've gotten use to having 50-60 Rams free.

So what do you mean by "Old 6.5 UI", aren't you using the latest of all? or is DCD?

for now I am but some don't like the new User Interface and what I mean by stability I plan on updating frequently when these new builds come out like how I did when I was making the very first 6.5 roms so if you want something firm DCD will be the way to go

**jakdillard** · #**436** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:24 PM

speaking of new http://www.sendspace.com/file/xvoew1 23037 beta1

quadjacks · #**437** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard

for now I am but some don't like the new User Interface and what I mean by stability I plan on updating frequently when these new builds come out like how I did when I was making the very first 6.5 roms so if you want something firm DCD will be the way to go

Yeah i feel you! So what are the main concerns with the New Build? I mean it sounds like a lot of fuss over CHANGE, which is ALWAYS hard to except!

**jakdillard** · #**438** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks

Yeah i feel you! So what are the main concerns with the New Build? I mean it sounds like a lot of fuss over CHANGE, which is ALWAYS hard to except!

only thing I can say is try it out lol because there is major changes from just 23016 lol

quadjacks · #**439** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard

only thing I can say is try it out lol because there is major changes from just 23016 lol

Wow ok i will... And thanks for taking the time.... Yo that was kewl!!!

sudermatt · #**440** (**permalink**) 08-26-2009, 08:51 PM

jak,

question about the build numbers....you're now on 037 .. are these your own build numbers? or are they the actual base build numbers.

I'm curious, because I want to make sure the PhoneROMs DB is accurate.

Thanks,
Matt