PPCGeeks

PPCGeeks (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/index.php)
-   CDMA TP Development (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   JD's Clean Windows Mobile 6.5 ROM & Kitchen (updated Oct.14) (http://forum.ppcgeeks.com/showthread.php?t=73860)

quadjacks 08-26-2009 08:06 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

mgioia2 08-26-2009 08:13 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks (Post 1123665)
I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

In my opinion there isn't much difference at all between the two. You'll get basically the same experience out of both JD and DCD's ROM's. They're clean, fast as hell, and work, no questions asked...

jakdillard 08-26-2009 08:14 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks (Post 1123665)
I have been using D.C.D. exclusively for a bit now and was wondering how this ROM compared.

if you want regular stability and like the old 6.5 UI unless DCD jumps builds I would stay there truthfully there is nothing to compare as we both for the time being are making clean ROMS

quadjacks 08-26-2009 08:20 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard (Post 1123678)
if you want regular stability and like the old 6.5 UI unless DCD jumps builds I would stay there truthfully there is nothing to compare as we both for the time being are making clean ROMS

Well having a VZW machine, the eye candied ROMs are very sluggish So i've gotten use to having 50-60 Rams free.

So what do you mean by "Old 6.5 UI", aren't you using the latest of all? or is DCD?

jakdillard 08-26-2009 08:24 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks (Post 1123692)
Well having a VZW machine, the eye candied ROMs are very sluggish So i've gotten use to having 50-60 Rams free.

So what do you mean by "Old 6.5 UI", aren't you using the latest of all? or is DCD?

for now I am but some don't like the new User Interface and what I mean by stability I plan on updating frequently when these new builds come out like how I did when I was making the very first 6.5 roms so if you want something firm DCD will be the way to go

jakdillard 08-26-2009 08:24 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
speaking of new http://www.sendspace.com/file/xvoew1 23037 beta1

quadjacks 08-26-2009 08:31 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard (Post 1123703)
for now I am but some don't like the new User Interface and what I mean by stability I plan on updating frequently when these new builds come out like how I did when I was making the very first 6.5 roms so if you want something firm DCD will be the way to go

Yeah i feel you! So what are the main concerns with the New Build? I mean it sounds like a lot of fuss over CHANGE, which is ALWAYS hard to except!

jakdillard 08-26-2009 08:42 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by quadjacks (Post 1123712)
Yeah i feel you! So what are the main concerns with the New Build? I mean it sounds like a lot of fuss over CHANGE, which is ALWAYS hard to except!

only thing I can say is try it out lol because there is major changes from just 23016 lol

quadjacks 08-26-2009 08:45 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23036 beta1 post 5 082609)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jakdillard (Post 1123725)
only thing I can say is try it out lol because there is major changes from just 23016 lol

Wow ok i will... And thanks for taking the time.... Yo that was kewl!!!

sudermatt 08-26-2009 08:51 PM

Re: JD 2.01-lr3 082009 (23031) (new 23037 beta1 post 5 082609a)
 
jak,

question about the build numbers....you're now on 037 .. are these your own build numbers? or are they the actual base build numbers.

I'm curious, because I want to make sure the PhoneROMs DB is accurate.

Thanks,
Matt


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0