Attention ROM Junkies: Beta Testers Needed for Future ROM Releases - Page 2

Glossman · #11 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dr_don

You mean this thread was an invitation to test a rom in another thread? I don't know if I wanna do it now. I though it was a private cutting edge rom.

It was, originally to be a private test. But no one responded when it was originally posted on 1/5, so I changed my format to a public Beta. This thread came to the top of the forum today when sgc144 found it and posted. Please don't hold that against me.

Anyway, it is cutting edge, but it's just not private.

dr_don · #12 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 07:56 PM

I was just so pumped, i guess i'll still try it when i get home.

You gotta give these things time to work, I usually only log on 1-2times per week in the evening. no worries mate!

Glossman · #13 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dr_don

I was just so pumped, i guess i'll still try it when i get home.

You gotta give these things time to work, I usually only log on 1-2times per week in the evening. no worries mate!

Thanks for understanding!

**Juicy47** · #14 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 08:29 PM

What are the bleeding edge changes? (XIP/Kernel/etc.) Or are there changes that may simply just make things unstable?

Glossman · #15 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy47

What are the bleeding edge changes? (XIP/Kernel/etc.) Or are there changes that may simply just make things unstable?

Good question. This build descended from early non-released builds in which I experimented with placement and usage of various files. I'm looking to lighten the memory load, so I also did some work in some of the OEMs to see if I could eliminate some fat. I've had some good results, but I've also had some inconsistent and unstable builds. Also, I never realized just how easy it is to wind up with a non-bootable ROM. In other words, just because G'Reloc ran, it doens't mean it's gonna boot!

**Juicy47** · #16 (**permalink**) 01-27-2009, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glossman

Good question. This build descended from early non-released builds in which I experimented with placement and usage of various files. I'm looking to lighten the memory load, so I also did some work in some of the OEMs to see if I could eliminate some fat. I've had some good results, but I've also had some inconsistent and unstable builds. Also, I never realized just how easy it is to wind up with a non-bootable ROM. In other words, just because G'Reloc ran, it doens't mean it's gonna boot!

usually non-booting is b/c of (in particular order) XIP, .ROM, .VM failure to run PROVXMLS, or something else in SYS .... usually not OEM unless it is a crucial driver

nub4life · #17 (**permalink**) 01-28-2009, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy47

usually non-booting is b/c of (in particular order) XIP, .ROM, .VM failure to run PROVXMLS, or something else in SYS .... usually not OEM unless it is a crucial driver

Sorry to take this post offtopic, but Juicy, I miss you!!!