|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
Quote:
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
Quote:
All I asked was what exactly you meant by there will always be 2 wireless companies... You NEVER mentioned that previously in your posts. (believe me I read them) Also in your latest post you mentioned a hypothetical merger of VZN and ATT (probably unlikely). ... again, you NEVER mentioned that before either. So, yes in the sum of all your comments, now I understand what you are saying but before you were not clear about your "always will 2 wireless companies". That's ALL I was asking about.. so easy and drop to insults. |
|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
Notice the smiley I put there, just like you did?
For clarification, a monopoly in the wireless industry will NOT happen. The government won't let it. |
|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
Quote:
Are just totally unnecessary. It just leads to an insult fest and leads the thread down the path to nowhere and is eventually closed. |
|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
cenflo, stop trying to get last word on the subject. Letting something go means getting back on topic.
Here lets try this: I think Sprint will end up getting a bs bailout from the government just like the big 3 car companies are getting. If we are to learn anything from the auto bailout, it's this: Companies dont need to learn from their mistakes, or sell items to make money. |
|
||||
Re: Bad news for Sprint...
Quote:
But getting back on topic. I wouldn't count of Sprint getting any bailout. The only reason that the financial institutions got the bailout is because if the banks failed the whole country would go down. If Sprint failed, it would be bad, but not catastrophic for the country (but it probably would be catastrophic for PPCgeeks...) Look how difficult it has been for the auto companies to get bailout money... I don't think Sprint has the clout nor the impact as the big 3 auto companies. |
|
|
|