Since FROYO is Beta, does it make more sense to use 2.1?

stcardinal · #1 (**permalink**) 07-04-2010, 08:44 PM

It seems like everyone's talking abotu 2.2. I was just wondering which is more stable to use? And will development continue for 2.1 or did everyone jump ship to FROYO?

daddymikey1975 · #2 (**permalink**) 07-04-2010, 10:57 PM

I've been using the froyo beta for 2 days now (and my wife has as well) and I think it's pretty stable (all things considered)

hope this helps

captobie · #3 (**permalink**) 07-05-2010, 03:48 PM

Aren't all the builds "beta" at this point?

Grogck · #4 (**permalink**) 07-10-2010, 06:06 PM

The slight UI enhancements in Froyo and the native Outlook support were enough for me to jump to it. I'm only in Android for relatively short bursts, but I still want/need Exchange support. I know you can do it via app pre-Froyo, but it's just one less thing to worry about.

jamio88 · #5 (**permalink**) 07-10-2010, 06:29 PM

So then this build is running smoother then 2.1 Eclair?

Eclair (with Sense UI) was neat and all, but the HORRIBLE lag time made it not worth it (IMO)

It was like being in 1997 with dial-up and my IBM Aptiva

ghdtpdna · #6 (**permalink**) 07-12-2010, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamio88

So then this build is running smoother then 2.1 Eclair?

Eclair (with Sense UI) was neat and all, but the HORRIBLE lag time made it not worth it (IMO)

It was like being in 1997 with dial-up and my IBM Aptiva

The lag is still nothing compared to the lag in WM.
I would say my 2.2 with Mario live wallpapaer with 5 widgets runs smoother than WM that's been running for more than 5 hours.

revaaron · #7 (**permalink**) 07-14-2010, 06:19 PM

I just started using it at 4pm today and I'm beyond impressed. If the ringing worked and I didn't so many SoD, I would convert to it. oh and the battery life would have to go up...