View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:25 AM
Malatesta's Avatar
Malatesta
Moderator/WMExperts Staff
Offline
Location: NY
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,413
Reputation: 3635
Malatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIPMalatesta is still contributing even after becoming a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
patmannyc nailed it.

Push uses I believe (roughly) 2.8% battery/hour which is quite efficient.

Make no mistake, it uses battery power but it's very little and worth it due to the convenience. When Exchange/push came out there were some battery issues which usually had to do with the server side "pinging" too much.

That's all been fixed now. Mail2web is a great example of superior service. 4smartphone as well.

In general, efficiency goes like this (leas to most)

pop3 --> imap --> imap/idle and Exchange push

Polling 'X' mins is less efficient than push or exchange.

Also, if you are concerned about battery life, pick yourelf up a Seidio 2400 mah battery (600 more than the standard). It's the same size as the stock and will add significant power to your device.
__________________
Reply With Quote