View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:14 AM
arrrghhh's Avatar
arrrghhh
Testing Extraordinaire
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,604
Reputation: 7360
arrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the communityarrrghhh is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: [TESTING] SCBS: Improved battery meter system

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveholtam View Post
Well my phone is constantly receiving texts (from Twitter), emails, WordFeud updates, etc. So maybe my sleeping time will be far and few between. Will the SCBS compute for this?

Here is my latest:

cc=0.386893785
cb=111.315805545
rc=0.711410240
re=0.157943773
vf=1.098000000
cf=0.312500000
lr=0.000001000
sl=4.600294081
se=0.116924412

It's just over four hours of data. Can I or should I merge all my logs into one to get a better overall result? I wish I knew what the above numbers mean...
jonpry would need to explain them all... I vaguely know what some of the metrics are.

se we know is sleep error. Perhaps you need to get a baseline with a new data.img so your phone can actually sleep? I guess if your phone is never sleeping, then it's not a big deal... Not sure how that works to be honest. Your sleep error looks better at least, 11.6%. I'm not really sure how scbs accounts for devices that never sleep... I would think sleep error would always be skewed, but if the device rarely sleeps perhaps that point is moot. Again, jonpry would be the man to confirm .
Reply With Quote