Thread: Is there 100 percent functional Android for Touch ?
View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2010, 01:01 AM
YnYng's Avatar
YnYng
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 311
Reputation: 315
YnYng is becoming a PPCGeeks regularYnYng is becoming a PPCGeeks regularYnYng is becoming a PPCGeeks regularYnYng is becoming a PPCGeeks regular
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Is there 100 percent functional Android for Touch ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aau007 View Post
So the donut is slower than eclair, but is the donut still faster/snappier than WM? What am I missing between 1.6 and 2.1 Android?

honestly dude... its ridiculously faster. Id even recommend going straight to froyo (2.2) and overclocking to 520 mhz. its runnin fast as heck and stable, get about 1.5 days battery life too. But 2.1 has a few new features, and runs a little faster than 1.6
heres a link->
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=712310

n check this for an "sd" version http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=724231

if you flashed to android, to flash back to wimno, u just put it back into bootloader and flash any rom as normal.
pm if u need anythin, ive become pretty good with this since i found my old vogue lol
__________________
HIT THANKS IF I HELPED!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenscivic View Post
On a side note, I told my fiance what I was doing and she said I am officially a nerd, so I punched her in the ovaries and screamed out "Ppcgeeks ROCKS!"
Last edited by YnYng; 07-14-2010 at 01:04 AM.