Quote:
Originally Posted by itster
again ms keeps info for 1 year and google for 7 then archives. did you know google requires the interviewer of any officer in their company to submit their question in advance?
|
What does an interview officer have to do with anything...a company can easily go abroad and then no one can question them...and M$ keeps your info longer then 1 year...they keep it as long as the account is open and a bit after that.
Quote:
|
ME is the worst OS MS came out with and admitted it.. wtf does ME have to do with vista? MS proved there is nothing wrong with vista by doing the mojave or whatever test it was they did and showed the public the OS is fine. plus hardware vendors always pay for licensing, it's been like that forever. I guess MS was asking for too much especially when it takes millions upon millions in salaries to come up with an OS right?
|
I have nothing against Vista..as I said I had an ME computer so I can't complain...the issue with it if anything was it was uncomfortable to use by experienced users due to the lock down and its gfx requirements.
Quote:
|
MS is much better and much more honst google has ever been. MS is no angel but comparing google to MS i like comparing a car theif (MS)to a terrorist (google)
|
Yes M$ admits it is evil and Google "pretends" to be good but deep down is trying to conquer the world I know...and comparing a car thief to a terrorist is a bad example..because many terrorists are not "evil" just ignorant and thinks what they are doing is right..the car thief knows what he is doing is wrong and does it anyways...
Quote:
|
seriously, ive been in this business longer than you have used a computer (judging by what you're saying). i don't need to make any more points.
|
Ahm..why do you assume this? I used pcs back before windows even existed with plain DOS.
Quote:
|
windows 2000 server is where MS started killing linux, not 2003. they continued with 2003.
|
Ahm..win2000 is no way a killer of linux...I know because I am actually responsible for buying web servers and I can tell by the offerings that windows2000 was no where there..The high end market had no reason to migrate and the low end market didn't bother to much due to lack of virtualization and control panels on the platform.
Quote:
|
edit: please find me a 2002 system that is vista ready or certified.. uneducated!
|
Well I had this old Averatec 2200 that has a label "Vista Capable" and a via chipset that probably would be outperformed by a netbook :/..it was in no way Vista capable and it had the best customization features..if I had lower Id imagine how horrid it would be.
Thank you I will