View Single Post
  #417 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2009, 03:53 PM
BlackDynamite's Avatar
BlackDynamite
VIP Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,839
Reputation: 1190
BlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on repBlackDynamite is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Who plans to go HD2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolApathy View Post
Because my friend, most of the innovative phone technology is being implemented overseas where GSM is prevalent. CDMA is superior to GSM in many ways, but has not flourished due to proprietary coding and the already flourishing GSM "flashy phone" market.


-And on topic: I am not planning on moving to the HD2. The screen is pretty, but just too big for my taste. It's something about having to switch from a phone holster to a briefcase that turns me off...
I'm not buying it. So you're telling me that the largest Canadian CDMA carrier is spending billions to convert their existing network into an inferior network? I don't think so man.

I already listed several advantages GSM has over CDMA that are immediately noticable to the end user. I haven't seen one single advatage listed for CDMA. It's just a bunch of people saying "CDMA must be better because coverage in my area is better" or "CDMA is better because I have read it in the past" or whatever.