|
|
||||
![]()
Everyone should start bugging ZAGG for a shield for the TP2 with no front camera hole. The more we bug them, the faster we'll get it. The default screen-protector (in the box) sucks bad. Smudge City. Worst I've ever seen.
Request here: http://www.zagg.com/hotgadgets/index.php |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
Quote:
![]()
__________________
JOE ()() BALL *formerly joeball88*If I managed to help you out, please hit the 'thanks' Button! |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"THE HTC EVO LTE..........YES, IT'S A BEAST AND A HALF"
![]() |
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
lol. Good input guys. So would you use a screen protector even if you had another case, like a holster or the leather sleeve case that came with the HTC branded TP2?
|
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
I consider Ghost Armor a better product. They have had CDMA TP2 armors for a few weeks now. Mine should be here tomorrow. Though I can't put it on while exchanging TP2 with stuck pixels
![]() http://www.ghost-armor.com/htc/htc-t.../prod_278.html |
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
I think its worth getting, it takes all of two seconds to scratch your screen all to hell. I am a guy who has low to medium length fingernails and I like to use my thumbnail to navigate the screen, its just as accurate as the stylus. Anyway, I think I had just came from working on my girlfriends car and didn't realize that my nail was slightly chipped. In any case I picked up my diamond and proceeded to put one hell of a scratch on the bottom of the phone when I was scrolling across. If I had a screen protector it wouldn't have gone down like that.
Last edited by themuffinman; 08-10-2009 at 02:00 PM. |
|
||||
Re: Request the "No Front Camera" TP2 InvisibleSHIELD
I bought the one with the camera hole, I'll let you know how it works out.
|
![]() |
|
|
|