![]() |
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
Quote:
But pressing the start button alone, or even scrolling through image-heavy lists, shows a definite improvement... definite enough to not be psychological. |
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Also be warned that the results are not always consistent Quote:
While there are certain performance increases with things like list population (\Windows folder comes to mind), typing seems more responsive, and a few other things seem to be a little quicker... but a lot of the stuff you would think (and hope) would speed up sadly doesn't at all For example: I use Sashimi to install all my programs and make my regedits automatically after every flash. It usually takes about 15 minutes to run. Overclocking the CPU does NOT make it finish even a second faster. Believe me, I've timed it. Scrolling through the manila tabs does not seem to improve much (if at all), apps do not open any quicker, and the homescreen weather animations are still slow as molasses. I think there are many other bottlenecks at play here. Overclocking the CPU may help to some degree in a few areas and it's fun to do, but if you can't seem to get yours to overclock too much then fear not - you won't be missing all that much |
Wirelessly posted (htc Pocket PC: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11) Sprint MP6950SP)
Quote:
After oc at 768mhz it scored much higher than most if not all other devices in each category. I may try to install spb benchmark and see what I get. |
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
Quote:
|
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
Quote:
According to the dynamic power equation in physics, the dynamic power draw of a circuit is P=ACV^2F *where A = activity factor (i.e. CPU switching), C = the capacitive load, V^2 = voltage squared, and F = the frequency By increasing the frequency of the CPU (i.e. overclocking) by, say 35%, you would see an increase of 35% in the CPU's specific power draw on the battery. Yet, for some reason, increased battery drain does not appear to occur. My only hypothesis on this is that the general CPU frequency must not be a major power drain on the battery (whereas screen brightness, video encoding, web browsing, et. al. are) so increasing F on the chip doesn't suck that much more battery |
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
i noticed if settings put on jump/load min = 10 with 1 step @ 691.2, while playing music, it does not freeze/SOD, and during calls, basically its perfect!
|
Wirelessly posted (htc Pocket PC: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile6.0) Sprint T7380)
Quote:
|
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
I'm glad to see these posts where people state their OCT settings. I've found a pretty stable setup, one where I get a noticeable speed increase, but slapping someone else settings on there, only to discover that it's another viable solution is great. Plus, I want to see what setting ends up getting the majority of us to our max.
Please keep posting your setup folks, I have a lot of faith in OCT. |
Re: *OVERCLOCK* Specific OCT V1.5 Settings
Quote:
I'm new to OCT, and to my understanding, it'll be better to "automatically" ramp up when computing heavily and down when nothing is running to give a good performance and still not burn the battery. But because I don't use music player that much, I didn't test all the conditions to verify the settings. |
Wirelessly posted (htc Pocket PC: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11) Sprint MP6950SP)
Quote:
My current settings are: cpu_max: 768mhz steps: 2 load_max: 25 load_min: 10 jump_max: 50 jump_min: 2 interval: 950ms Working great! :) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com