![]() |
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
i've had always used SPB, from TOUCH, TOUCH PRO, and now TOUCH PRO 2... Honestly, the more i got familiar with spb the more i found Manila annoying to use but that is my personal opinion. I find Spb to be more simplified.
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
How's the speed? the only reason I'm not using it is that I have found 3.x to be sluggish...
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Did they dump the widget-ized Professional layout? That's the major reason I switched back to 3.0.1...
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
is the battery drain issue still present? I tried it for a day and my battery died after 4 hours. went back to manila and it last 1.5 days now. go figure. Otherwise it was a great shell.
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Agreed. It works flawlessly for me and with SPB Plus Ultimate it beats Manila in both visual appeal and utility. It seems to consume about the same amount of RAM, if not less.
http://imgur.com/6uUPj.png |
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Quote:
What exactly is SPB Plus Ultimate, and where can it be bought? Also, how did you get that clock? |
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Quote:
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=566679 EDIT: A pic of SPB Mobile 3.5 without SPB Plus Ultimate: http://www.mobilitydigest.com/wp-con...p_image002.jpg |
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Quote:
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
Quote:
|
Re: new spb shell works much better with tp2
for cdma it still has issues
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com