|
View Poll Results: Diamond'back' preference | |||
Diamond edged/glossy |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
42 | 38.18% |
Telus dk grey |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
34 | 30.91% |
Sprint mulberry |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 19.09% |
Don't care |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 11.82% |
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
And you'll have spent $20 for a back you can't use on a CDMA phone.
|
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
I voted for the Telus back. Will either buy a Telus back, or I'm sure someone will offer a black replacement at some point. I can live with red for awhile.
The original back, of course, is not even an option in North America. |
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
Do you guys think that MAYBE a company will make a faceted black cover for the Diamond and/or Pro?
It just looks sooo freekin sweet! I love geometric shapes
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
Quote:
![]() |
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
Sorry, never should have posted a link to the ebay faceted back. Not intentionally trying to lead people astray, did not know at the time that it wouldn't fit.
I do think it would be great to see a similar back for the CMDA version, but there might not be much of a market for such a custom peice.
__________________
Old school PDA... Toshiba Libretto 70-> Kyocera 6035 Palm -> Samsung SPH-I500 Palm clamshell... Now 6900
|
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
i prefer my Telus back, but id like to add its not gray at all its a matte black.
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: What type of "backside" do you prefer... for your Diamond?
The glossy Diamond back sucks. Trust me. It get's scratched up, fingerprinted, and is slippery. Cover it with a shield or replace it ASAP. I dunno why the frack it is the number one choice.
|
![]() |
|
|
|