PPCGeeks Forums HTC Arrive HTC HD2 HTC Thunderbolt HTC Touch Pro 2 HTC Evo 4G HTC Evo 3D Samsung Galaxy S II Motorola Droid X Apple iPhone Blackberry
Go Back   PPCGeeks > Windows Mobile > WM HTC Devices > HTC Apache > HTC Apache Development
Register Community Search

Notices


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:42 PM
Raging Idiot's Avatar
Halfway to VIP Status
Offline
Pocket PC: TouchPro Upscaled to 800mhz + REV/B = Fast as hell
Carrier: Nimitz
Location: State of Confusion
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 745
Reputation: 182
Raging Idiot is keeping up the good workRaging Idiot is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
huh? you're post about my post makes no sense whatsoever.

I understand it works for some rather particular scenarios... I clarified that it did not work for my particular needs. And gps has nothing to do with it... sheesh.

Raging Idiot
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:50 PM
PolloLoco's Avatar
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Pocket PC: HTC Touch Pro
Carrier: Sprint
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 290
Reputation: 135
PolloLoco is keeping up the good workPolloLoco is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You initially called XCPUScalar a sugar pill - do you want me to explain in depth how you did that?

You then followed that up by explaining that it was worthless to you because it didn't speed up your slowest apps.

Can you not understand how someone could see your second statement as validation for the first?

So I gave some EXAMPLES where the program wouldn't speed up those applications, while still accomplishing what it's supposed to. I took a shot in the dark at GPS because you mentioned navigation from the memory card in your post. Copy understood the same, because he ran a benchmark of XCPU and navigation.

This discussion is totally off topic, but it started when you called this performance app & XCPUScalar 2 sugar pills.

Last edited by PolloLoco; 01-11-2008 at 02:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:05 PM
blasphemous_prime's Avatar
Let me count thy wounds
Offline
Pocket PC: Photon 4G
Carrier: Sprint
Location: Newark, NJ, and sometimes Philadelphia, PA
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,403
Reputation: 2754
blasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIPblasphemous_prime is a VIP
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to blasphemous_prime Send a message via Yahoo to blasphemous_prime Send a message via Skype™ to blasphemous_prime
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidGixxer View Post
Here is a cab i slapped together.
thanks... now i'm running from 400 to 520 on my mogul like nothing, but i'm not even gonna try it on 624 due to the risks.
__________________
If you are literally serving shit to American children, or knowingly spinning a wheel where it is not unlikely that you will eventually serve shit – if that’s your business model? Then I got no problems with a jury of your peers wiring your nuts to a car battery and feeding you the accumulated sweepings from the bottom of a monkey cage. In fact, I’ll hold the spoon.” -Ralph Dunlop-
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:34 PM
Raging Idiot's Avatar
Halfway to VIP Status
Offline
Pocket PC: TouchPro Upscaled to 800mhz + REV/B = Fast as hell
Carrier: Nimitz
Location: State of Confusion
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 745
Reputation: 182
Raging Idiot is keeping up the good workRaging Idiot is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You're an ass.

Seeing you decided to overlook my post with the clarification:
"I did very strict tests with these overclockers...my results were different than yours, perhaps because I ran the navigation testing from storage card or maybe setup differences- I don't know."

Also this thread is still right on target IMO as these overclocking details are being clarified.

As for these apps...well I don't have stock in them, and although they didn't fit my needs maybe they fit yours.
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:50 PM
PolloLoco's Avatar
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Pocket PC: HTC Touch Pro
Carrier: Sprint
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 290
Reputation: 135
PolloLoco is keeping up the good workPolloLoco is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
LOL at your reply and the namecalling. The sad thing is that I had originally replied to you with no animosity, I just debated your conclusions.

No, I did not overlook that statement about your testing criteria, since both I and another member DIRECTLY addressed it.

Apparently a "sugar pill" is any program that doesn't directly meet your needs, in spite of doing exactly what it says. Gotcha.*

*edited to note that yes, this last sentence was unnecessary and written out of spite over the namecalling.

Last edited by PolloLoco; 01-11-2008 at 03:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:30 PM
CopyCounsler's Avatar
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
Pocket PC: ppc6800 - bye bye ppc6700
Carrier: spcs
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 90
Reputation: 10
CopyCounsler is a n00b
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So now I guess it would be nice to get the CPU's autoscale turned off some how. I remember when I upgraded my thinkpad laptop's processor to a p3 proc on a p1 board the autostepping on the p3 was "disabled" due to the p1 incapability of utilizing this feature. So. Either a debug session to turn it off or a cut trace on the mainboard.

Any takers?

Now that I've pulled the wool from my eyes I really would like to tackle this autostep situation with some hands on experimenting... Any direction from anyone would be appreciated. Even if it means opening up my referb'd POS, I'm fine with that.

So. Another question. If I lock my proc @ 520 (like it already is) is it still speed stepping with the built in CPU's stepping (my guess is yes) and if so why doesn't it do it effectively enough to actually save power? Does it only step one down or does it actually alter the frequency in a non-multiplier fashion?

----------------

I've got the gun to my 6700's display. I'm ready to pull the trigger.

Copy
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:37 PM
Raging Idiot's Avatar
Halfway to VIP Status
Offline
Pocket PC: TouchPro Upscaled to 800mhz + REV/B = Fast as hell
Carrier: Nimitz
Location: State of Confusion
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 745
Reputation: 182
Raging Idiot is keeping up the good workRaging Idiot is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
dude.. that's why you're an ass. Taking sh!t out of context via half quotes and misdirection such as the gps ass-umption, and saying the clarifications were "off topic"...not to mention your misconception of chronological order. bleh

Nobody gives a crap anyway.

Bottom line this debate did fish out some useful details which might not have appeared had not certain egos been at stake.

Raging Idiot
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 05:12 PM
PolloLoco's Avatar
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Pocket PC: HTC Touch Pro
Carrier: Sprint
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 290
Reputation: 135
PolloLoco is keeping up the good workPolloLoco is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So be it. I'll let readers determine who the ass is in this discussion.

Copycounslr, good luck with actually getting the phone to shut off it's own scaling. I don't know if anyone's tried a hardware solution like you're suggesting . . . I definitely don't have the experience. I know Anton's looked at the programming end for a long time, and PHM hasn't been able to solve it either.

If your phone is locked in at 520, and you're not autoscaling in XCPUScalar - then it's definitely autoscaling at the phone's original rate. I thought you were talking about a savings versus the stock phone frequency. Everytime you're actively running the phone - it'll be at 520, which means it's burning more energy than a 6700 out of the box. However, otherwise - it'll be burning the same power as you would otherwise see on standby. Did I explain that clearly?

You're not going to be saving more energy than a stock phone, but you would only be burning more power when actually using the overclock. That's why I love to use my phone at 624 100% of the time, I've been doing it for over the last year. I don't think the power loss is significant at all. With a 2600 lithium polymer battery, I can still go 2 days of heavy use without charging - though my phone will be close to dead by the end.
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 06:08 PM
Raging Idiot's Avatar
Halfway to VIP Status
Offline
Pocket PC: TouchPro Upscaled to 800mhz + REV/B = Fast as hell
Carrier: Nimitz
Location: State of Confusion
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 745
Reputation: 182
Raging Idiot is keeping up the good workRaging Idiot is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
sounds good to me...

too bad scaling will likely never work on dual processor phones such as mine...
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 03:00 AM
Maxx134's Avatar
VIP Member
Offline
Pocket PC: Epic Touch 4G
Carrier: Spint
Location: NYC
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,272
Reputation: 4320
Maxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributionsMaxx134 should be added to the payroll for their contributions
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolloLoco View Post


You're not going to be saving more energy than a stock phone, but you would only be burning more power when actually using the overclock. That's why I love to use my phone at 624 100% of the time, I've been doing it for over the last year. I don't think the power loss is significant at all. With a 2600 lithium polymer battery, I can still go 2 days of heavy use without charging - though my phone will be close to dead by the end.

I mentioned long ago in both Xcpu & PHM my findings on the 6700, to disable autoscaling & also increasing the "Bus" speed as being more effective than just CPU speed. :P

For those of you who want the best performance on a 6700:


Turn on "VJLumosII" (to disable auto-scale)
Open Pocket Hack Master.
Set speed to either:
520Mhz,260B,130m,65lcd
546Mhz,273b,137m,68lcd
572Mhz,286b,143m,72lcd
Goto settings/system/backlight.
Lower brightness.
Goto PHM & exit application.
Open "CPU-ID".
Verify unit still running overclocked without PHM.
Open "acbPowermeter" to verify unit using less Ma draw.
Open TCPMP player & open a video.
In TCPMP select file/benchmark and verify HUGE increase in performance.

There you have it...
Your unit will revert to normal when you turn off.

Last edited by Maxx134; 01-15-2008 at 01:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

  PPCGeeks > Windows Mobile > WM HTC Devices > HTC Apache > HTC Apache Development


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com