|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
So he isn't mistaken, it depends. There is no universal lock from ICS on all of Sprints or any other carrier's Winmo phones. Some do, some do not. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
Anyway, doesn't matter either way, it's still a TOS violation even if I do a regedit to change the connection name from one thing to another (still, hardly call that a "hack" it's just changing the name. It's still just dialing "PPP") Anyone who knows how this stuff actually works knows its something sprint (or your carrier) controls - they can turn it off on their end and all the "tweaking" in the world would not get you around it. The fact that they don't doesn't make it "legal" but it does make it "tolerated".
__________________
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
i'm agreeing with you agreeing with chef. i've been tuned in to this channel since 3:17pm yesterday. but i assume we both agree that tethering is warez until someone proves that it's not( and not with the lines we've heard so far).
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
interesting. i've had the issue with my apache, my touch, my touch pro and my son's mogul. why was yours different than mine? now i'm confused.
|
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
Quote:
I do know that the latest Mogul ROM deactivated it on my friends phone. After getting a TEP refurb (not for this issue) he was able to do this again without any alteration. |
|
||||
Re: Warez Vs. Tethering
I didn't even do the ICS hack on my Mogul. There was never a PAM entry in my phone and my wmwifirouter worked fine and sprint never said anything about it.
|
|
|
|