Quote:
Originally Posted by obamaftw08
You know, I can sum up everything you just said without needing a disclaimer about rudeness and/or being highly demeaning, in a much more refined form.
Hello fellow radio testers. I'm gonna try and put up a guide here soon to let you know about some other testing scenarios/guidelines in which I think would be helpful for everyone here to figure out what works best for each person individually. In the meantime let me find a link that will give everyone an idea of what I'm talking about.
See? Easy peesie. No thanks needed.
|
Unfortunately, that does not address the major concerns that were my reason for posting.
I wanted to cull the the spread of misinformation before it got out of hand, as it almost always does when discussing this topic.
I wanted to list the most common sources of inaccuracy, and explain *why* they were inaccurate, so that people reading would stop relying on them.
I also wanted to provide a non technical way that ppl could test the radios, without needing a degree in network engineering, and wireless physics, that would still provide a *VERY* meaningful, and helpful contribution to the community as a whole, as well as for themselves.
That being said, I re-read my post, and while I certainly did not intend to sound demeaning, and don't really think I was tbh, there are phrases I could have worded a bit more softly, and would have changed some of the wording in the second paragraph in particular.
For that, I apologize.
07-13-2009, 05:38 AM
Threaded Mode
