This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
i dont think it will get faster until hw3d is figured out. I hit a road block with the 3d. Ive been trying to figure it out for 3 weeks now but no real results.
Maybe its time to recruit more developers. After mrpippy vanished the rhod development slowed down drastically. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
I want to learn ARM ASM, but it's highly confusing to me... terms like registers and pointers and stacks scare me, I had nightmares last night because of them lol...
Naw seriously though I am just having a hard time following through the code, Like I'm trying to look through the battery code and find the exact calculations so that I can get my battery fix to work better, but I just can't seems to figure out what means what... I get the whole R0-15 concept and what each line BASICALLY does, but I get lost in trying to find out where the code is "popping" and "pushing data to and from the stack... and where the exact calculations are happening... I have IDA Pro and I know a bit of x86 ASM, but ARM doesn't seem to fall into the same level... I need like a guide for ARM ASM... |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
Quote:
Either way I am getting my wife a Evo come June 4th. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
Quote:
The way im approaching the 3d is backwards. I made a wince app to load up ahi2dati directly so i can see what part of the mem is being affected. Thats the easy part. I tried putting those addresses into the kernel code but no luck. So i'm almost thinking that it may not be memory related. ATI doesnt really have any documentation on this and they most likely wont help. i want to get more devs involved. We are lacking manpower on the Rhod. |
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
Unless you live in the MIDDLE of a huge city, I, personally, would recommend against the Evo. Simply because 4G coverage has been said time and time again to be patchy... And then there's the whole no physical keyboard... and that's a deal breaker for me, but everyone has their own preference.
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
Quote:
And the physical keyboard has always been the deal breaker for me, but at the convention in Feb I got to handle an EVO and dude lemme tell u, hands down no questions asked I'm getting it lol.. I think you have to handle it to appreciate it... All my PPC's have always had keyboards but times are changing and so am I
__________________
|
This post has been thanked 1 times. |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
Quote:
On your battery fix. Do I need the zimage and modules file? Do I just replace the files in the andriod folder or do they need to go in the storage card root folder???? |
|
||||
Re: Android AOSP 2.1 vs 2.1 w/ sense
If you're going to wait till July 4 to upgrade, you might just wait for the HTC "Vision" to be announced and see if it's going to happen for sprint or not...
On the fix, I believe only the zImage is required. Because in testing for accuracy I simply replace that one file. The modules only get installed when it boots for the first time and there is no data.img file there. And just replace them wherever your android install is and boots from. |
|
|
|