|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
The biggest issue is drivers and knowing exactly how the hardware works on the device. While the platform is open source, people need to create and/or modify current drivers to get them working.
At least that's as far as I understand it. |
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
Quote:
Now for your question, since this is not ROM development it is a lot more difficult as WoZZeR999 said they have to create, or port these drivers from one operating system to another, they have to change code, this isn't just rooting your device, or for the TP2 unlocking the device, this is the developers writing, or porting code. We can't have an actual android on our device I don't think, all we can have is linux running what looks like android (someone please correct me if I'm wrong). So you see what these developers do is a lot more difficult then rooting a device, it's not easy to do what they do, it takes a lot of time and effort. Which is why I'm so thankful to all developers helping with this project!
__________________
If someone helps you press thanks!!
|
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
^we can eventually have a fully flashable version of android running, its just the fact that do you really want to flash your device to a barely working release? It's easier to just test it out using haret.
Last edited by nevergonnauseth; 05-12-2010 at 04:56 PM. Reason: wrong word |
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
There's no internal memory drivers yet (AFAIK), so that's why everything is done on SD cards now. Also, when you run haret, you are running the full OS, it's not emulated, so except for access times (if that's the problem, get a cheap class 8 or class 10 micro-sd) you won't see much of a difference.
|
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
Quote:
__________________
Earn some spare cash and get cash back at stores like NewEgg and more:
http://quickrewards.net/?r=!F94VXV35D5MV2 (My shameless referral link) ![]() ![]() |
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
Quote:
|
|
||||
Re: Porting challenges
Quote:
There are actually some people who have built on the official google Android tree, but I think XDAndroid offers some additional helpful features for developing and really there isn't a whole lot of reason that I know of to use vanilla Android over XDAndroid. As an interesting piece of trivia, the CDMA branch has actually changed during the course of the project too when it jumped back in to the GSM branch. Unless you are a big linux/open source buff though, I wouldn't get too worked up over which branch is which, generally whatever is linked in the main thread should be the most featureful and probably the best for general use. But this is "real" Android. |
This post has been thanked 2 times. |
![]() |
|
|
|