![]() |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
I'm by no means an expert, but if you think the issue is in the install-seq.sh, I think you're wrong :p. Keep the ideas flowing tho, don't want to diminish that! |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
I lost track and im trying to figure out what people tried and didnt try.
So last i heard the original NBHs work fine but obviously wipe nand. I'm assuming this is because our payload had some weird padding in there where the bad stuff may have been skipped? i never quite understood the internals of the payload. We may need to work backwards here in this case and begin with the old payload and work backwards. Not sure what else to recommend at this point |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
[TUT] Manual Full XIP Porting (& MANY MORE TUTORIALS) [ONLINE] - xda-developers You can always take the original payload and begin the butchering .. Edit: Also i notice that we are still using a different compression that the vogue (XPR vs lzx).. Did anyone ever try out the other one? (i included a bin if anyone wants to try it.) |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
I have been able to get it to now boot with adding the imgfs.bin by tinboot. @ @ Tinboot V 1.0 @ Very simple bootloader for H - Tinboot My partition table is very close to what the partition table of the booting ones are. NBInfo 2.1rc2 '00_OS.nb.payload' has valid boot - Rhod_Payload I made a couple of changes this morning adding in the imgfs.bin instead of the emptyimgfs. (lzx instead of xpr) Stinebd also pointed out that night that a couple parts of our scripts are wrong. Both Nate's and what is on GIT. For Nate's FullBuild.sh Line's 54, 70 and 76 need to have a - behind the $TOOLCHAIN_PATH... Like this $TOOLCHAIN_PATH- This is also the same for the GIT. And line 27 has the wrong config. It should be: make ARCH=arm htc_msm_nand_defconfig As DZO stated the bad blocks should be handled by the SPL... So maybe this is not working like it should with some devices. So I would like someone with bad blocks (like arrrghhh or Nate :)) to flash back to stock, and try it again. I'm cooking up a ROM like now that I would like you guys to test and get back to me. I will attach the modules if successful. It also looks like ACL pushed the camera? :) Happy Flashing! EDIT: My Androidupdate.tar |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Downloading now, thanks L_miller... I'll let you know how it goes!
Status quo... no double vibe :/ ACL, I'll read and re-read that page... hopefully start to mess with this stuff. First reading leaves me in a fairly glazed state to be honest... :p. |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
|
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
Soooo.. can you build without the full initrd? or make a really small one. I say this because the original nhb missed the bad parts.. so the kernel is in a safe spot and most likely the initrd is broken. So we can either shrink it to a few K or move it far back. I say shrink it since Lmiller is able to append it on tinboot now. all we need is a initrd small enough to miss all the bad poop |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
Did you flash back stock first? If so maybe we need to try relocking??? Can any ROM cooker help out? |
Re: NAND Boot Testing - 01-07: Panel power on/off fixes
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2012 - PPCGeeks.com