View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007, 06:46 PM
storyr's Avatar
storyr
VIP Member
Offline
Location: Tacoma
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 883
Reputation: 5538
storyr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the communitystoryr is a trusted member of the community
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by codyppc View Post
I'm doing good buddy. thanks.

so are you saying that the vogue is slower (slugier) than the touch? If so, could we simply overclock a little to bring it back up to par?

can you post some links to your source? not that I don't belive you, its just that I thought I was following this pretty close. I haven't heard this.

thanks, cody
No, just the opposite! According to those specs you posted, the Touch has a TI 201 MHz processor, while the Vogue will have a Qualcomm 400 MHz processor. I'm not an expert on CPU's, but it certainly sounds faster


http://www.laptopmag.com/Review/HTC-Touch.htm

http://review.zdnet.com/smart-phones...-32465595.html

http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/inde...;pid;3789;pt;1