[celsius0010]

Unless he magically has a touch pro that is over a year old and is not covered by warranty there is nothing wrong or immoral about this. Now if sprint changed their policy and forced all hardware issues during the first year thru htc than yea this might be wrong technically. But since they dont and the phone isnt a year old he doesnt need previous insurance or to be the original owner to get a new phone. If sprint asked for the original receipt to prove it wasnt stolen that would be fine but since the esn is good its obviously not stolen.