Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoJr67
well, what else would be the next logical step after .9?
he's not disclosing the specific build numbers (or more importantly, what's in it).
|
The disclosure of
unreleased build numbers is a small issue, but not a limit to test in any event. I was reflecting on the referencing of
unreleased builds (full build number or not, e.g. v1.0 as opposed to v1.0xxxxxx) not beta builds (v.9). I'm not arguing for better or worse on this issue. It's just a concern of mine pertaining to alpha group restrictions.
Logical step-wise, Skyfire has been inconsistent before in the numbering of builds in the beta. They went from .6 to .8 to .9. Logic will only exist if there is consistency. I see logic in the numbering only after 10+ beta releases, as I've seen these inconsistencies at the beginning in other alpha testing until its clear where the logic is. For alpha groups, Skyfire's is pretty young, so I don't expect to see much logic until more time passes.