View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:00 AM
JBundy's Avatar
JBundy
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 80
Reputation: 350
JBundy is becoming a PPCGeeks regularJBundy is becoming a PPCGeeks regularJBundy is becoming a PPCGeeks regularJBundy is becoming a PPCGeeks regular
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Skyfire Alpha test team

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoJr67 View Post
well, what else would be the next logical step after .9?
he's not disclosing the specific build numbers (or more importantly, what's in it).
The disclosure of unreleased build numbers is a small issue, but not a limit to test in any event. I was reflecting on the referencing of unreleased builds (full build number or not, e.g. v1.0 as opposed to v1.0xxxxxx) not beta builds (v.9). I'm not arguing for better or worse on this issue. It's just a concern of mine pertaining to alpha group restrictions.

Logical step-wise, Skyfire has been inconsistent before in the numbering of builds in the beta. They went from .6 to .8 to .9. Logic will only exist if there is consistency. I see logic in the numbering only after 10+ beta releases, as I've seen these inconsistencies at the beginning in other alpha testing until its clear where the logic is. For alpha groups, Skyfire's is pretty young, so I don't expect to see much logic until more time passes.
__________________
JBundy
HTC Touchâ„¢/Windows Mobile 6.1
Sprint 3G (EV-DO Rev.A) CDMA2000
Reply With Quote