View Single Post
  #2919 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2009, 02:05 PM
AndrewSh's Avatar
AndrewSh
N00b
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 25
Reputation: 110
AndrewSh is keeping up the good workAndrewSh is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by rainabba View Post
Does anyone else "feel" like 21501 is less stable/more buggy than 21210?

More OEM incompatibilities than 21210?

Less smooth, or slower in Titanium and/or Start Menu compared to 21210?

I ask because I've got a Vogue running my custom rom based on 21210 and a Touch Pro running my custom rom based on 21501 (can't get it to build 21210 with the same selections), and my vogue is visibly faster, smoother, and less buggy. When I say visibly, I mean side-by-side and I know this just should be the case. My TP is a Sprint branded one (288MB RAM, 512MB ROM).

Please PM me if you believe you know some specific causes for this (it's hard to keep up with this thread). Maybe reply here and PM if you don't mind the double duty, just in case someone else needs the same info.
Guys you should know - even if you cook same rom twice in 10 minutes with one PC, one kitchen, same settings - you will hardly obtain the same rom. I don't know why it happens - but I know for sure - roms can be different in performance, amount of bugs, battery consumption and so on. During last three days I was playing with Titanium cpr-s and recooked the same 21501 maybe 10 times in one configuration. The results were different all the time - believe me. So it's nothing to do with that, rainabba - just recook and try again.
P.S. I won't PM.....
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 1 times.