View Single Post
  #2340 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2009, 07:11 AM
rainabba's Avatar
rainabba
PPCGeeks Regular
Offline
Location: Phoenix
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 172
Reputation: 270
rainabba is becoming a PPCGeeks regularrainabba is becoming a PPCGeeks regularrainabba is becoming a PPCGeeks regular
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: WM 6.5 Kitchen QVGA and VGA Developer Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by rgildoss View Post
i respectfully disagree ..if its a fake it should be marked as a fake and not put back into the community as a better running fake...

if you by a wife/husband a fake diamond ring no matter how much you scrub and shine it, its still a fake and in the end someone will be disappointed....

if it is a fake it should be MARKED as a fake ...I hope this is not what it has come to, "oh well it runs better then the real release so lets just keep it on the low and use it " thats not a cool way of looking at things....
So if you find that the majority of the population could be curred of their addictions (like smoking and drinking) by a sugar pill under the guise that it's a new treatment that addresses addiction at a genetic level, it shouldn't be done. Instead, we should just call it a sugar pill and ignore all the benefits. Am I understanding your logic correctly?
Reply With Quote