Going beyond the .dsm's (why does anyone pay attention to these easily hacked files?
)
Look into the code.. you can see several debug sections of code removed, the build number matches up in all the compiled modules that contain it, and the dates/times also match up.. there are none of the typical indications that it's a hex edited build.. if anything, it would be a build generated from the internal system, with the build number incremented.. but again, that doesn't really qualify as fake..
It's 'fake' in the sense that there aren't any major changes from the previous build, but it's compiled a whopping 1 day later, so you can't really expect that.