data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ebb/63ebb5f28d063951b6fc278d7f0e5c1b832528e6" alt="Old"
08-29-2007, 07:43 PM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b1d0/0b1d0a656634b2bb1d80d7107dd00ff109bf9898" alt="Kolano's Avatar" |
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Threadstarter
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 422
Reputation: 71 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f174/2f17478918f4da6bbe9a6ff1e0dfbd84b5f100b2" alt="Kolano is becoming a great contributor"
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gguruusa
The problems with the web distribution approach are: how to include copyrighted works, bandwith, and end user customization. Until someone comes up with a way around the copyrighted works problem, don't expect a web based solution.
|
- Copyrighted works: Both the current and any future web based distribution approach have this same issue. Generally, we do our best to tread lightly.
- Bandwidth: With appropriate caching, a web DL based could save bandwidth by limiting DLs to just the components a particular set of installs required, and/or by distributing the DLs more (i.e. getting OEMs from their authors rather than PPCGeeks).
- End user customization: The easy solution here is the enable a local file store as part of the solution. It's not clear how one might customize a web based install, but presuming some local caches were used one could edit those files. Much of this would depend on the sort of update/healing the web DL process provides. Generally, improved methods of packaging/editing OEMs could address this.
For now I think most of the update efforts are focused on providing better ways to set and transfer selections across runs (i.e. without manual edits of option.xml files)
|