Hi all,
I think what every one needs to do is look at the first two posts in this thread. They form the foundation from which everything was said.
The first thread contains a link to a press release which describes an entirely new data architecture (as needed and justified by my friend OffUrRcker ).
It also contains a single word, formed as a question : "torrent".
The second post contains an accusation of piracy (even though the press release shows that the solution is not entirely software based).
It also contains the inference that the 6700 is somehow different from other WM5 machines in the fact that because it is "dying" it will be unable to run software written for "a variety of Java, BREW, and Windows Mobile handsets."
The OPs request for a torrent could only supply a non-functional client. Thus "stealing" (which is a legal accusation) is unwarranted.
And the statement that "I wouldn't expect this to work on he Apache ever" has nothing to do with the facts, and nothing to do with the OPs original post.
In fact, all it did was call the OP a thief, and then present the opinion that the 6700 would never run a program written for "a variety of Java, BREW, and Windows Mobile handsets."
|