Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gguruusa
Just because you know "what" it is, doesn't mean you knew "it". And, yes, they can argue you are enabling circumvention - people can argue damn near anything. But it is true, just because you publish the combination of a lock doesn't necessarily mean a crime has been committed - but you certainly are fostering the potential for a crime.
|
So if I had worn a T-shirt in the 70's with a picture of the Cap'n Crunch whistle on it, that would be fostering potential for a crime? I don't think so.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gguruusa
I think it's because it was largely misleading and irrelevant as to whether the video mail software will work or not. If you had said WM5 platforms will probalby not be supported, no one would have blinked.
|
It's irrelevant for me to opine,
in the Apache forum, that a particular piece of software may not work on the Apache? I don't see how you could possibly think it's misleading. I was just posting my opinion about whether it would ever work on the Apache.
Guys, it's a fscking cell phone. It's a $99 toy. Don't get your panties in a bunch over it.