Quote:
Originally Posted by SporkLover
The company is struggling because of their own actions..... not the users. And a sprint phone on Verizon networks doesnt hurt them if they aren't subsidized. If it was a full purchase then whats the issue?
Your analogy of snow tires was not a good one. With Sprint you are paying for a service, and they are the ones that tell you if your home address or area you are in the most is under coverage and whether or not they can service you. If they cannot do that with their normal cell tower coverage, why shouldnt users try to get them to provide the coverage anyway they can?
When you buy a Vette, Viper, Porsche, WRX STi, Evo, etc etc that come with high performance street tires, you shouldnt be expecting to be able to use them all year round. However, when Sprint sells you service and they say it covers your house, you should expect them to be able to carry through.
|
Um, how do we know Sprint said anything about their coverage covering the OP's work? As subscribers we should take a tad bit of responsibility in the matter to find out before hand if our providers will work where we are located. I'm
assuming Sprint worked just fine for the OP until the job came along, in which case, no, Sprint has no obligation to give away free stuff, nor do they have an obligation to carry through on anything.