View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2009, 06:04 PM
pjsnyc's Avatar
pjsnyc
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Threadstarter
Location: NYC
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 253
Reputation: 160
pjsnyc is keeping up the good workpjsnyc is keeping up the good work
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via ICQ to pjsnyc Send a message via AIM to pjsnyc Send a message via MSN to pjsnyc Send a message via Yahoo to pjsnyc Send a message via Skype™ to pjsnyc
Re: Windows Mobile touch interfaces galore

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaun0207 View Post
I truly dont see WM becoming the power house it could be unless MS starts to release it own devices through Danger. Right now they license WM out to whomever wants it. when they start to produce their own devices and see what it takes to get a phone out there that they want the public to truly love, will they finally get it and fix WM.
This really brings me to the original consensus I was trying to obtain:
Would you rather have an OS that is rock solid as a backend so that phone manufacturers (HTC, Samsung, HP, etc) can skin it the way they like
OR
Would you rather have an OS that is rock solid including the GUI but not be able to customize it as much, put it on other hardware, etc.

Edit - I guess I should've just started a poll, lol.
__________________
Reply With Quote