View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2009, 05:22 AM
gguruusa's Avatar
gguruusa
Deep Thinker
Offline
Location: Mountain top
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,252
Reputation: 4726
gguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributionsgguruusa should be added to the payroll for their contributions
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Guide to changing your pagepool

Quote:
Originally Posted by keaolyen View Post
i can only think of 1 or 2 other possibilities...

1) static keeps data in page pool on reset where static doesn't; normally this would be called volatile memory though...
2) static is always in the same physical location while dynamic moves around...

If a dynamic page pool doesn't mean that it changes in size as needed then I would think option 1 would be the most likely definition. But, as I pointed out there's already a term for that...
Nah, we all agree that dynamic means something about allocating on demand. What isn't clear to me is that FormerPalmOS's statement about how it is configured is correct. For example, maybe Dynamic(12) means dynamic, max of 12 MB. Or maybe Dynamic(12) means dynamic, minimum of 12 MB. I haven't seen anything official that says exactly how dynamic works in current kernels. It just doesn't strike me as reasonable that Microsoft would have modified the pagepool configuraton stuff for no apparent gain in flexibility.
__________________
Grammar: The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.
Reply With Quote