View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2009, 12:45 AM
FormerPalmOS's Avatar
FormerPalmOS
Regular 'Geeker
Offline
Threadstarter
Location: Far far away...
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
Reputation: 1355
FormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on repFormerPalmOS is halfway to VIP status based on rep
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Re: Touch Pro / WM6 file system caching and performance discussion

I learned a couple of new items that mostly render this discussion moot. First and foremost, for the changes to be effective on the FLASHDRV FAT file system, they must be made to the boot hive that is loaded by the SPL. The registry that you can edit after the system is booted is loaded by the file system - these changes need to be made to the minimal registry (boot.hv) that is loaded in order to load the file system. That means they have to be cooked into the ROM.

That said, you can apply these changes to the SDMemory file system.

I also learned that the system-manged settings actually appear to do a pretty good job. I am currently running with DataCacheSize and FatCacheSize both set to 0 (system managed) on my SD card and it seems to be faster (but then again I also thought the machine was faster with the changes made in the first thread and that may not have been the case).

I have updated the first post to reflect the new learning - the remaining posts have not been updated.
__________________
ROM: WM6.5 nk.exe (Da_G), sys 23518 (Da_G), VZW OEM pack (scrosler)
Apps: Manila 2.1 (yozgatag), Leo dialer (pyrorob)
Reply With Quote
This post has been thanked 2 times.